🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee earning average wages must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average American pays. I know multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both worker and company payments. And, like much of federal defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.